Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Decorso v. Calderaro

Decorso v. Calderaro

991 A.2d 564, 295 Conn. 919, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 127
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 30, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 991 A.2d 564 (Decorso v. Calderaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Decorso v. Calderaro, 991 A.2d 564, 295 Conn. 919, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 127 (Colo. 2010).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 617 (AC 30353), is denied.

*920 Gail DeCorso, pro se, in support of the petition. Laura Pascale Zaino and Alfred J. Zullo, in opposition. Decided March 30, 2010

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeCORSO v. CALDERARO
985 A.2d 349 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
991 A.2d 564, 295 Conn. 919, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decorso-v-calderaro-conn-2010.