DeCordova v. Atchison

13 Tex. 372
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1855·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

It cannot be questioned that the assignment [373]*373of the note by the payee, passed to the plaintiff, as assignee, the legal title. (Gayle et al. v. Ennis et al. 1 Tex. R. 184.) And that the party in whom, is the legal title may sue, though the equitable ownership be in another, has long been a settled question in this Court. (Thompson v. Cartwright, Id. 87.) It is wholly immaterial to the plaintiffs’ right of action in this ease, in whom may reside the equitable ownership of the note; and surely that is a question in which the plaintiffs in error can have no interest. The writ of error was manifestly pros» edited for delay only, and the judgment is affirmed with damages.

Affirmed with damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeCordova v. Atchison, 13 Tex. 372 (Tex. 1855).

13 Tex. 372 (DeCordova v. Atchison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poulter v. Davis
130 S.W.2d 914 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Mauritz v. Schwind
101 S.W.2d 1085 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Ormsby v. Ratcliff
22 S.W.2d 504 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Neyland v. Lanier
273 S.W. 1022 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Woods v. Warren
141 S.W. 293 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Continental Oil & Cotton Co. v. E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Works
131 S.W. 415 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Wright v. Jones
120 S.W. 1139 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Browne v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
80 S.W. 593 (Texas Supreme Court, 1904)
S. Jacobs, Bernheim & Co. v. Crum
62 Tex. 401 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Sanders & Crittenden v. Atkinson ex rel. Le Gierse & Co.
1 White & W. 774 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)
Rodgers v. Bass
46 Tex. 505 (Texas Supreme Court, 1877)