Decker v. New York Belting & Packing Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decker v. New York Belting & Packing Co.

7 F. Cas. 333, 11 Blatchf. 76, 6 Fish. Pat. Cas. 374, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1598

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedApril 9, 1873

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 7 F. Cas. 333 (Decker v. New York Belting & Packing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Decker v. New York Belting & Packing Co., 7 F. Cas. 333, 11 Blatchf. 76, 6 Fish. Pat. Cas. 374, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1598 (circtsdny 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The case of Commercial & Railroad Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, 14 Pet. [39 U. S.] 60, 64, 65, is a decisive authority that a corporation does not waive an objection to the jurisdiction of the court over it, by appearing and pleading, by an attorney, to the jurisdiction of the court. That jurisdiction over a Connecticut corporation cannot be acquired by this court, by sendee of process on one" of its officers, in this district, is settled by tbe cases of Day v. Newark India-Rubber Manuf’g Co. [Case No. 3.685], and Pomeroy v. New York & N. H. R. Co. [Id. 11,261],

The motion for an injunction is denied, for want of jurisdiction of the court over the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The case of Commercial & Railroad Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, 14 Pet. [39 U. S.] 60, 64, 65, is a decisive authority that a corporation does not waive an objection to the jurisdiction of the court over it, by appearing and pleading, by an attorney, to the jurisdiction of the court. That jurisdiction over a Connecticut corporation cannot be acquired by this court, by sendee of process on one" of its officers, in this district, is settled by tbe cases of Day v. Newark India-Rubber Manuf’g Co. [Case No. 3.685], and Pomeroy v. New York & N. H. R. Co. [Id. 11,261],

The motion for an injunction is denied, for want of jurisdiction of the court over the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 F. Cas. 333, 11 Blatchf. 76, 6 Fish. Pat. Cas. 374, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decker-v-new-york-belting-packing-co-circtsdny-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack