Decker v. Coffey

357 S.W.2d 673, 1962 Ky. LEXIS 131
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMay 18, 1962
StatusPublished

This text of 357 S.W.2d 673 (Decker v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Decker v. Coffey, 357 S.W.2d 673, 1962 Ky. LEXIS 131 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

CLAY, Commissioner.

Appellant is the owner of land through which there is a private passway appellee [674]*674is entitled to use. For his convenience in driving his cattle over this passway, appel-lee asserted a right to fence it through appellant’s land. This right was confirmed by a judgment which determined other controversies between the parties.

It appears the proposed fence will be erected (or already has been erected) a few feet off the right of way, although the judgment does not specify its exact location. The location, however, is not material.

The only interest appellee has in appellant’s land is an easement to use the pass-way. He has no right to erect fences on such land either within or without the confines of the passway. This very question was settled in the case of Higdon v. Nichols, 204 Ky. 56, 263 S.W. 665.

The judgment is reversed to the extent that it adjudges appellee a right to place fencing on appellant’s land.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higdon v. Nichols
263 S.W. 665 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 S.W.2d 673, 1962 Ky. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decker-v-coffey-kyctapp-1962.