Deck v. Kautz
This text of 133 N.W. 870 (Deck v. Kautz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for |74.30 in an action on a saloon-keeper’s bond. He moved the district court for a judgment for his costs. This motion was overruled, and it was ordered that each party pay his own costs. Prom this order plaintiff appeals.
The only point we think involved was settled in Rosenbaum v. Dunston, 16 Neb. 111. We are content to adhere to the rule announced therein.
The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 N.W. 870, 90 Neb. 440, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deck-v-kautz-neb-1911.