Deck v. Kautz
133 N.W. 870, 90 Neb. 440, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 380
Opinion
The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for |74.30 in an action on a saloon-keeper’s bond. He moved the district court for a judgment for his costs. This motion was overruled, and it was ordered that each party pay his own costs. Prom this order plaintiff appeals.
The only point we think involved was settled in Rosenbaum v. Dunston, 16 Neb. 111. We are content to adhere to the rule announced therein.
The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Deck v. Kautz, 133 N.W. 870, 90 Neb. 440, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 380 (Neb. 1911).
133 N.W. 870 (Deck v. Kautz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosenbaum v. Dunston
16 Neb. 111 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1884)