Deck v. Kautz

133 N.W. 870, 90 Neb. 440, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 380
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 1911
DocketNo. 16,577
StatusPublished

This text of 133 N.W. 870 (Deck v. Kautz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deck v. Kautz, 133 N.W. 870, 90 Neb. 440, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 380 (Neb. 1911).

Opinion

Letton, J.

The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for |74.30 in an action on a saloon-keeper’s bond. He moved the district court for a judgment for his costs. This motion was overruled, and it was ordered that each party pay his own costs. Prom this order plaintiff appeals.

The only point we think involved was settled in Rosenbaum v. Dunston, 16 Neb. 111. We are content to adhere to the rule announced therein.

The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Rose, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenbaum v. Dunston
16 Neb. 111 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 N.W. 870, 90 Neb. 440, 1911 Neb. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deck-v-kautz-neb-1911.