Decision Writ

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided July 28, 2026·No. 2026 KW 0931·Unknown

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISTANA NO. 2026 KW 0931 VERSUS

JAMES D. MCINTOSH, IT JULY 28, 2026 In Re: James D. McIntosh, II, applying for supervisory writs,

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No. 21-CR9-146489.

BEFORE: WOLFE, STROMBERG, AND BALFOUR, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include a copy of the transcript of the trial court’s July 27, 2026 ruling denying the motion to continue. Although it is not a violation of the Uniform Rules, this court cannot adequately review the district court’s ruling herein. See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So.2d 710 (La.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S.Ct. 246, 78 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983). Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9. In the event relator elects to file a new application with this court, he may do so without the necessity of obtaining a return date, and the application shall be filed on or before July 28, 2026 at 2 p.m. Any future filing on the issues presented herein should include the entire contents of this application, the missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling.

EW TPS KEB

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

LJ Our. Sy WW DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decision Writ, (La. Ct. App. 2026).

Decision Writ (Decision Writ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Baton Rouge v. Plain
433 So. 2d 710 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)