Decision In State v. Donald Ray Smith, No. 02C01-9805-Cc-00151 (Tenn. Crim.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE FILED OCTOBER SESSION, 1999 February 16, 2000
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk
STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) No. 03C01-9904-CC-00167 Appellee, ) ) COCKE COUNTY vs. ) ) Hon. BEN W. HOOPER, II, Judge EMIT KEITH CODY, ) ) (First Degree Murder) ) Appellant. )
SEPARATE CONCURRING
I write separately to acknowledge my participation in this court’s previous
decision in State v. Donald Ray Smith, No. 02C01-9805-CC-00151 (Tenn. Crim.
App. at Jackson, Apr. 29, 1999), perm. to appeal granted, (Tenn. Nov. 8, 1999),
which ordered reversal of the conviction and dismissal of the indictment under
procedural circumstances similar to those in the case sub judice. Notwithstanding, in light of the supreme court’s Rule 11 grant in this case and, more importantly, Judge Welles’ thorough analysis of this unique procedural
issue, I amnow persuaded that my prior position requiring dismissal of the indictm in Smith ent
requires revisiting. Indeed, the case law to which this court is bound to follow is clear that double jeopardy would not bar retrial in the present case. See Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33, 109
S.C 285 (1988); State v. Longstreet, 619 S.W.2d 97 (Tenn. 1981). With this explanation, I join in t.
the majority’s opinion.
____________________________________ DAVID G HAYES, Judge .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Decision In State v. Donald Ray Smith, No. 02C01-9805-Cc-00151 (Tenn. Crim. (Decision In State v. Donald Ray Smith, No. 02C01-9805-Cc-00151 (Tenn. Crim.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.