DeCintio v. Catania

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DeCintio v. Catania

275 A.D.2d 758, 714 N.Y.S.2d 217, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9419

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 758 (DeCintio v. Catania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeCintio v. Catania, 275 A.D.2d 758, 714 N.Y.S.2d 217, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered July 15, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendants Joanne Catania and Robert L. Weiner to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them for failure to state a cause of action (see, Lazich v Vittoria & Parker, 189 AD2d 753, [759]*759754; Town of N. Hempstead v Sea Crest Constr. Corp., 119 AD2d 744). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered July 15, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendants Joanne Catania and Robert L. Weiner to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them for failure to state a cause of action (see, Lazich v Vittoria & Parker, 189 AD2d 753, [759]*759754; Town of N. Hempstead v Sea Crest Constr. Corp., 119 AD2d 744). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 758, 714 N.Y.S.2d 217, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decintio-v-catania-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack