DeCicco v. Chemung County Board of Elections

719 N.E.2d 526, 93 N.Y.2d 1008, 697 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2104
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 25, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 719 N.E.2d 526 (DeCicco v. Chemung County Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeCicco v. Chemung County Board of Elections, 719 N.E.2d 526, 93 N.Y.2d 1008, 697 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2104 (N.Y. 1999).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

In this case supporters of John Trice simultaneously circulated a petition designating him as Conservative Party candidate for District Attorney of Chemung County and a petition for an opportunity to ballot for the Conservative nomination for that office. Both petitions contained the same signatures and were executed on the same date. The designating petition was invalidated for failure to receive the required certificate of authorization from the Conservative Party (see, Election Law § 6-120 [3]).

The Appellate Division was correct in ruling that the petition for an opportunity to ballot was also invalid under Election Law § 6-134 (3) inasmuch as all of the voters signing that petition had also signed the designating petition on the same date.

Election Law § 6-134 (3) provides that if on the same date a voter signs “any petition or petitions designating a greater [1010]*1010number of candidates for public office * * * than the number of persons to be elected thereto [the voter’s signatures] * * * shall not be counted.” As it is clear that the opportunity to ballot necessarily implies a vote in the primary for someone other than the person named in the designating petition (see, Election Law § 8-308 [2]), the Appellate Division properly relied solely on section 6-134 (3) to invalidate the signatures on the opportunity to ballot petition.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Potiker v. Bohlke
205 A.D.3d 1203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Murray v. Simon
2021 NY Slip Op 03136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Stack v. Harrington
2019 NY Slip Op 4314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Keenan v. Chemung County Board of Elections
43 A.D.3d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Elgin v. Smith
10 A.D.3d 483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
719 N.E.2d 526, 93 N.Y.2d 1008, 697 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decicco-v-chemung-county-board-of-elections-ny-1999.