DeChirico v. DeChirico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DeChirico v. DeChirico

6 A.D.3d 436, 774 N.Y.S.2d 367

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.3d 436 (DeChirico v. DeChirico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeChirico v. DeChirico, 6 A.D.3d 436, 774 N.Y.S.2d 367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the husband appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an ex parte order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Marks, J.), dated July 10, 2003, as directed him to pay the wife the sum of $5,000 as an attorney’s fee, and (2), by permission, from an order of commitment of the same court dated September 15, 2003.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 10, 2003, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an ex parte order (see Bailen v Jones, 102 AD2d 859 [1984]); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2003, is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

[437]*437Subsequent settlement of the issues raised on appeal has rendered the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2003, academic. Altman, J.P., Florio, Luciano and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the husband appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an ex parte order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Marks, J.), dated July 10, 2003, as directed him to pay the wife the sum of $5,000 as an attorney’s fee, and (2), by permission, from an order of commitment of the same court dated September 15, 2003.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 10, 2003, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an ex parte order (see Bailen v Jones, 102 AD2d 859 [1984]); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2003, is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

[437]*437Subsequent settlement of the issues raised on appeal has rendered the appeal from the order dated September 15, 2003, academic. Altman, J.P., Florio, Luciano and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 436, 774 N.Y.S.2d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dechirico-v-dechirico-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack