DeCesare v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
This text of 256 A.D. 1036 (DeCesare v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The decision is on the authority of Lampke v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (279 N. Y. 157) decided November 29, 1938. We construe the word “ void ” as meaning “ void at the election of the insurer ” or, in other words, “ voidable ” (Blinn v. Schwarz, 177 N. Y. 252; Huntley v. Perry, 38 Barb. 569; Richards on Insurance [4th ed.], 171), and, therefore, not a condition precedent. We take into consideration the fact that the policy was prepared by the defendant, that the defendant did not rest on a general denial but affirmatively pleaded breach of the condition which was controverted by avoidance in the form of a waiver or estoppel, and that while proof of the waiver was received out of order it was a mere matter of procedure which the trial court had a right to vary. The burden of proving the waiver was on the plaintiff and the court so charged. All [1037]*1037concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action under life insurance policies. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D. 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decesare-v-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1939.