DECAY v. State

289 S.W.3d 96, 375 Ark. 139, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 674
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DECAY v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Ark. LEXIS 743
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 20, 2008·No. CR 08-1259·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Denny Hyslip and Julie C. Tolleson, full-time, state-salaried public defenders for the Fourth Judicial District, were appointed by the trial court to represent appellant, Gregory Christopher Decay. Following a jury trial, Decay was convicted of two counts of capital murder and sentenced to death as to both counts. A notice of appeal was timely filed and a request for the transcribed record was filed in this case.

Mr. Hyslip and Ms. Tolleson now ask to be relieved as counsel for appellant in this criminal appeal based on the case of Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), where we held that full-time, state salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal. Since Rushing, the General Assembly passed Arkansas Code Annotated § 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2007), which states:

A person employed as full-time public defender who is not provided a state-funded secretary may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals.

Mr. Hyslip and Ms. Tolleson’s motion states that they are provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary. Accordingly, we grant their motion to withdraw as attorneys. Mr. Dale Adams will be substituted as attorney for appellant in this matter. The clerk will establish a new briefing schedule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECAY v. State, 289 S.W.3d 96, 375 Ark. 139, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 674 (Ark. 2008).

289 S.W.3d 96 (DECAY v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rushing v. State
8 S.W.3d 489 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)