Decatur v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decatur v. State

103 S.E. 720, 25 Ga. App. 547, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 69

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 28, 1920

Docket11632

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 720 (Decatur v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Decatur v. State, 103 S.E. 720, 25 Ga. App. 547, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 69 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Ltjke, J.

The evidence authorized the conviction of the defendant. There is no merit in the assignment of error upon the excerpts from the charge of the court. The charge of the court was full and fair, and if more specific instructions to the jury were desired a timely written request should have been made therefor. It was not error, for any reason urged, to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ltjke, J.

The evidence authorized the conviction of the defendant. There is no merit in the assignment of error upon the excerpts from the charge of the court. The charge of the court was full and fair, and if more specific instructions to the jury were desired a timely written request should have been made therefor. It was not error, for any reason urged, to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.E. 720, 25 Ga. App. 547, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decatur-v-state-gactapp-1920.