Decatur County Bank v. Broome

142 S.E. 565, 37 Ga. App. 821, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 639
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1928
Docket18635
StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 565 (Decatur County Bank v. Broome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Decatur County Bank v. Broome, 142 S.E. 565, 37 Ga. App. 821, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 639 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A written instrument purporting upon its face to be a mortgage to secure the payment of a promissory note therein specifically described, and containing a defeasance clause, and in which no contrary intention otherwise appears, is held to be intended by the parties as a mortgage, and not a bill of sale.

2. The general lien of a laborer upon the property of his employer, foreclosed in pursuance of the provisions of the statute, is of superior priority to a mortgage execution issued to foreclose such an instrument.

3. Upon the grounds stated above, the court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition, or in its award of the funds involved.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Bloodivorth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.E. 565, 37 Ga. App. 821, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decatur-county-bank-v-broome-gactapp-1928.