Decatur Bank & Trust Co. v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decatur Bank & Trust Co. v. Arnold

120 S.E. 527, 156 Ga. 850, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 346

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 27, 1923·No. No. 3719·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition. Achey v. Coleman, 92 Ga. 745 (19 S. E. 710); Protestant Episcopal Church v. Lowe, 131 Ga. 666 (63 S. E. 136, 127 Am. St. R. 243); Missouri State Life Insurance Co. v. Barnes, 147 Ga. 677 (3), 680 (95 S. E. 244).

[851]*851No. 3719. November 27, 1923.

2. The evidence demanded the verdict, and accordingly the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. Howell Green, for plaintiff. O. J. Googler, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition. Achey v. Coleman, 92 Ga. 745 (19 S. E. 710); Protestant Episcopal Church v. Lowe, 131 Ga. 666 (63 S. E. 136, 127 Am. St. R. 243); Missouri State Life Insurance Co. v. Barnes, 147 Ga. 677 (3), 680 (95 S. E. 244).

[851]*851No. 3719. November 27, 1923.

2. The evidence demanded the verdict, and accordingly the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. Howell Green, for plaintiff. O. J. Googler, contra.

Decatur Bank & Trust Co. v. Arnold, 120 S.E. 527, 156 Ga. 850, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 346 (Ga. 1923).

Pincite

120 S.E. 527 (Decatur Bank & Trust Co. v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related