Decarlos Adrian Kelly v. Adidas Usa, Incorporated

Fourth Circuit

Decarlos Adrian Kelly v. Adidas Usa, Incorporated

57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21742, 1995 WL 352560

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1995

Docket94-2514

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1066 (Decarlos Adrian Kelly v. Adidas Usa, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Decarlos Adrian Kelly v. Adidas Usa, Incorporated, 57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21742, 1995 WL 352560 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Decarlos Adrian KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Adidas USA, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2514.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

DeCarlos Adrian Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Fred W. Suggs, Jr., Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's employment discrimination suit as time-barred under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e-5(f)(1) (West 1994), and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 12117(a) (West Supp.1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kelly v. Adidas USA, Inc., No. CA-94-2086-7-19-B (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Decarlos Adrian KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Adidas USA, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2514.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

DeCarlos Adrian Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Fred W. Suggs, Jr., Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's employment discrimination suit as time-barred under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e-5(f)(1) (West 1994), and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 12117(a) (West Supp.1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kelly v. Adidas USA, Inc., No. CA-94-2086-7-19-B (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21742, 1995 WL 352560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decarlos-adrian-kelly-v-adidas-usa-incorporated-ca4-1995.