Decarlo v. Pettinato

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Decarlo v. Pettinato

697 A.2d 145, 303 N.J. Super. 410, 1997 N.J. Super. LEXIS 379

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedJune 19, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 697 A.2d 145 (Decarlo v. Pettinato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Decarlo v. Pettinato, 697 A.2d 145, 303 N.J. Super. 410, 1997 N.J. Super. LEXIS 379 (N.J. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter having been duly presented by the court, it is on this 19th day of June, 1997, hereby Ordered as follows:

The motion for leave to appeal is granted and the court elects pursuant to R. 2:8 — 3(b) summarily to decide the appeal.

[411]*411We affirm the denial of the summary judgment motion of Cigna Property & Casualty Companies for an adjudication of non-coverage based on the business exclusion.

The balance of the summary judgment requiring Cigna Property & Casualty Companies to defend and indemnify is reversed as improvident and premature.

/s/ FOR THE COURT:

/s/ SYLVIA B.PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI