DeCarlo v. Borough of Cliffside Park

216 A.2d 408, 90 N.J. Super. 126, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 373
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJanuary 17, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.2d 408 (DeCarlo v. Borough of Cliffside Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeCarlo v. Borough of Cliffside Park, 216 A.2d 408, 90 N.J. Super. 126, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 373 (N.J. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The opinion of the Law Division in this case is reported at 86 N. J. Super. 169 (1965). The borough concedes that its installation of the directional sign in question did not comply with A. J. 8. A. 39 :L-197(1) (c) or A. J. 8. A. 39 :4r-8. It was therefore guilty of active wrongdoing, for which it is answerable for such damages as may have been proximately caused to the corporate plaintiff in its tavern and restaurant business. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the Law Division to determine the issue of damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Visidor Corp. v. Borough of Cliffside Park
225 A.2d 105 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.2d 408, 90 N.J. Super. 126, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decarlo-v-borough-of-cliffside-park-njsuperctappdiv-1966.