Decardenas v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

559 So. 2d 314, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2150, 1990 WL 37432
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1990·No. No. 89-73·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. FDIC, 315 U.S. 447, 62 S.Ct. 676, 86 L.Ed. 956 (1942); FDIC v. McClanahan, 795 F.2d 512 (5th Cir.1986); FDIC v. Investors Assocs. X., Ltd., 775 F.2d 152 (6th Cir.1985); FDIC v. Berr, 643 F.Supp. 357 (D.Kan.1986); Scott v. NCNB Nat’l Bank of Fla., 489 So.2d 221, 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decardenas v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 559 So. 2d 314, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2150, 1990 WL 37432 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

559 So. 2d 314 (Decardenas v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MMH VENTURE v. Masterpiece Products, Inc.
559 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)