DeCambra v. Agsalud
This text of 613 P.2d 361 (DeCambra v. Agsalud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Edwin L. DeCambra is a claimant who applied for unemployment insurance benefits in 1975 under chapter 383, Hawaii Employment Security Law. Following an informal interview with the Department of Labor claims examiner, appellant was declared to be ineligible for the claimed benefits as he was determined to be not “available for work” under Hawaii Revised Statutes § 383-29(a)(3) and his claim was denied.
The decision of the claims examiner was upheld by the Department’s referee following a de novo hearing, and the referee’s decision was likewise upheld by the circuit court upon appeal.
This appeal presents the identical issues resolved in the prior case of Ainoa v. Unemployment Compensation Appeals Division, 62 Haw. 286, 614 P.2d 380 (1980).
On the basis of Ainoa, this case is reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
613 P.2d 361, 62 Haw. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decambra-v-agsalud-haw-1980.