Dec v. Auburn Enlarged School District
This text of 222 A.D.2d 1100 (Dec v. Auburn Enlarged School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed [1101]*1101without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs motion to compel petitioner, a non-party witness, to appear pursuant to subpoena at an examination before trial. The fact that petitioner changed her residence to North Dakota after service of the subpoena did not deprive the court of jurisdiction or plaintiff of his right to depose petitioner (see, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v Yen-Shang B. Chen, 186 AD2d 999; United Refrigerator Co. v Rose, 19 AD2d 809). In the exercise of our discretion, we modify the order on appeal by requiring plaintiff to pay petitioner’s reasonable expenses incurred in attending the examination before trial. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J. — Quash Subpoena.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Wesley, Balio, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D.2d 1100, 636 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dec-v-auburn-enlarged-school-district-nyappdiv-1995.