Debra Sparks v. Carolyn W. Colvin
This text of 595 F. App'x 654 (Debra Sparks v. Carolyn W. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Debra Sparks appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. For reversal, Sparks argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in his determination, because he failed to find that (1) her severe impairments included borderline intellectual functioning and (2) her mental impairment met Listing 12.05C. Following careful review of the parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that the doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes Sparks from relitigating whether her mental impairment met Listing 12.05C. See Hardy v. Chater, 64 F.3d 405, 407 (8th Cir.1995). We further conclude that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s findings regarding the credibility of Sparks’s subjective complaints, and the severity of her impairments. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
595 F. App'x 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debra-sparks-v-carolyn-w-colvin-ca8-2015.