Debra Kay Tellez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Debra Kay Tellez, No. CV-25-00263-TUC-AMM

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 On May 20, 2026, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending this Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint with 17 prejudice. (Doc. 21.) Judge Rateau notified the parties they had fourteen (14) days to file 18 any written objections to the proposed findings and recommendation. (Id. at 13.) Neither 19 party filed an objection, and the time to do so has now passed. 20 A district court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is 21 not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see also 28 22 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those 23 portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which 24 objection is made.”). “[T]he court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on 25 the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), 26 Advisory Committee Notes 1983 Addition. A district judge may “accept, reject, or 27 modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations” of the magistrate judge. 28 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 The Court has reviewed Judge Rateau’s R&R, the parties’ briefs, and the record. || The Court finds no clear error and agrees with the findings and recommendation. 3 Accordingly, 4 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (Doc. 5}| 21.) 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Complaint is DISMISSED WITH 7\| PREJUDICE. (Doc. 1.) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close 8 || this case. 9 Dated this 12th day of June, 2026. 10

12 ~ Honorable Angela M. Martinez United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-