Debra Jalufka v. Four Jlj, Inc., Dba, J4 Oilfield Service, and John Jalufka, as Agent

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 14, 2013
Docket13-13-00007-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Debra Jalufka v. Four Jlj, Inc., Dba, J4 Oilfield Service, and John Jalufka, as Agent (Debra Jalufka v. Four Jlj, Inc., Dba, J4 Oilfield Service, and John Jalufka, as Agent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Debra Jalufka v. Four Jlj, Inc., Dba, J4 Oilfield Service, and John Jalufka, as Agent, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

NUMBERS 13-12-00727-CV; 13-12-00728-CV; 13-13-00007-CV; AND 13-13-00022-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

DEBRA JALUFKA, Appellant,

v.

4 JLJ, INC.,/J4 OILFIELD SERVICE, 4 JLJ, INC., AND JOHN JALUFKA, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Debra Jalufka, filed appeals from orders entered by the 94th District

Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2012-DCV-2686-C. Appellant has

filed a motion to withdraw the appeals on grounds that she has filed a new notice of appeal from a final order signed on January 25, 2013. Appellant requests that this Court

withdraw the appeals.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

withdraw the appeals, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeals are hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 14th day of March, 2013.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Debra Jalufka v. Four Jlj, Inc., Dba, J4 Oilfield Service, and John Jalufka, as Agent, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debra-jalufka-v-four-jlj-inc-dba-j4-oilfield-servi-texapp-2013.