Debra, Inc. v. Orange County

445 So. 2d 404, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11840
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 16, 1984
Docket83-714
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 445 So. 2d 404 (Debra, Inc. v. Orange County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Debra, Inc. v. Orange County, 445 So. 2d 404, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11840 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

445 So.2d 404 (1984)

DEBRA, INC., Appellant,
v.
ORANGE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.

No. 83-714.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

February 16, 1984.

Miranda Franks of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Thomas J. Wilkes, Jr., and Stephen E. Cook of Gray, Harris & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

ORFINGER, Chief Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether appellant, defendant below, is entitled to an award of *405 attorney's fees under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1981).

In a final order from which no appeal was taken, the trial court dismissed the action with prejudice, finding that "[t]here is a complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact between the parties to this action at this time." Several months later, the court denied defendant's motion for attorney's fees which had been filed on the day the final order was entered. We find that this denial was erroneous and reverse.

Once the determination has been made by the trial court that there is a complete absence of a justiciable issue of law or fact, the award of attorney's fees to the prevailing party who properly moves for such fees is required. As we pointed out in Wright v. Acierno, 437 So.2d 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), an opinion not available to the trial court when the order appealed from was entered,

... We agree that the use of the word "shall" in the statute evidences the legislative intention to impose a mandatory penalty in the form of a reasonable attorney's fee once the determination has been made that there was a complete absence of a justiciable issue raised by the losing party... .

Id. at 244.

The order appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for the determination and award of a reasonable attorney's fee for the services of appellant's attorney. Appellant's motion for the allowance of an attorney's fee on appeal is also granted, the amount thereof to be determined by the trial court on remand. See TIE Communications, Inc. v. Toyota Motors Center, Inc., 391 So.2d 697 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COWART, J., and DAVIS, S.J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morton v. Heathcock
913 So. 2d 662 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
O'GRADY v. Potash
824 So. 2d 904 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Carbino v. Ward
801 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority v. Lake County Board of County Commissioners
587 So. 2d 651 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Wood v. Price
546 So. 2d 88 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
O'BRIEN v. Brickell Townhouse, Inc.
457 So. 2d 1123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 So. 2d 404, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debra-inc-v-orange-county-fladistctapp-1984.