Debra Hinkle v. the Crossing at Bradford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Debra Hinkle v. the Crossing at Bradford

DecidedOctober 8, 2009

Docket14-09-00623-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Debra Hinkle v. the Crossing at Bradford (Debra Hinkle v. the Crossing at Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Debra Hinkle v. the Crossing at Bradford, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 8, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-09-00623-CV

DEBRA HINKLE, Appellant

V.

THE CROSSING AT BRADFORD, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 941,907

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 6, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on July 13, 2009. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

After being given the requisite notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant has not paid the filing fee in accordance with our order of August 27, 2009. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Frost, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 8, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-09-00623-CV

DEBRA HINKLE, Appellant

V.

THE CROSSING AT BRADFORD, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 941,907

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 6, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on July 13, 2009. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

After being given the requisite notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant has not paid the filing fee in accordance with our order of August 27, 2009. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Frost, and Brown.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Debra Hinkle v. the Crossing at Bradford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debra-hinkle-v-the-crossing-at-bradford-texapp-2009.