Debra Erickson v. J.C. Bromac Corp.

687 F. App'x 531
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 14, 2017·No. 13-35288·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

1. The reference to $1 million in accident insurance in the agreement between J.C. BroMac Corporation, DBA EagleRider, DBA EagleRider Inc. (“EagleRider”) and Altria Consumer Engagement Services (“Altria”) was, at most, an offer to provide insurance. Since-there is no evidence that the offer was accepted by either Altria or David Erickson, it was not a binding contract. See Chipman v. Northwest Healthcare Corp., Applied, Health Servs., Inc., 373 Mont. 360, 317 P.3d 182, 185 (2014) (“Mutual consent consists of an offer and an acceptance of that offer.”).

2. Erickson accepted a different offer for accident insurance “upon the terms and conditions of the summary of coverage in the [Personal Accident Insurance/Personal Effects Coverage] brochure, a copy of which you acknowledge has been received by you.” The only brochure in the record refers to $100,000 in coverage, which amount EagleRider paid. Since there is no evidence of a brochure promising $1 million in coverage, EagleRider was entitled to summary judgment on Erickson’s estate’s claim for the higher amount.

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Debra Erickson v. J.C. Bromac Corp., 687 F. App'x 531 (9th Cir. 2017).

687 F. App'x 531 (Debra Erickson v. J.C. Bromac Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chipman v. Northwest Healthcare Corp.
14 MT 15 (Montana Supreme Court, 2014)