Debra a Paradiso v. City of Royal Oak
This text of Debra a Paradiso v. City of Royal Oak (Debra a Paradiso v. City of Royal Oak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 3, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
159337 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra DEBRA A. PARADISO, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159337 COA: 340757 Oakland CC: 2016-155600-NO CITY OF ROYAL OAK, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Wigfall v City of Detroit, 504 Mich 330 (2019).
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 3, 2020 t0224 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Debra a Paradiso v. City of Royal Oak, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debra-a-paradiso-v-city-of-royal-oak-mich-2020.