Debra a Paradiso v. City of Royal Oak

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 2020·No. 159337·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 3, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

159337 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

DEBRA A. PARADISO, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

v SC: 159337 COA: 340757 Oakland CC: 2016-155600-NO CITY OF ROYAL OAK, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Wigfall v City of Detroit, 504 Mich 330 (2019).

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 3, 2020

t0224

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Debra a Paradiso v. City of Royal Oak, (Mich. 2020).

Debra a Paradiso v. City of Royal Oak (Debra a Paradiso v. City of Royal Oak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.