DeBow v. State
This text of 323 N.E.2d 260 (DeBow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DeBow appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief contending that his guilty plea must be set aside for the trial court’s failure to advise him of his constitutional rights before accepting his plea.
[294]*294From a review of the record of the arraignment proceedings it is clear that the trial court failed to advise the defendant of his right to confront his accusers or his privilege against self-incrimination. Brimhall v. State (1972), 258 Ind. 153, 279 N.E.2d 557; Bonner v. State (1973), 156 Ind. App. 513, 297 N.E.2d 867.
This cause is reversed and remanded with instructions to grant the petition for post-conviction relief by setting aside the guilty plea and all other proper relief consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
323 N.E.2d 260, 163 Ind. App. 293, 1975 Ind. App. LEXIS 1030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debow-v-state-indctapp-1975.