DeBow v. M'Clary
14 S.C.L. 44
This text of 14 S.C.L. 44 (DeBow v. M'Clary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
DeBow v. M'Clary, 14 S.C.L. 44 (S.C. Ct. App. 1825).
Opinion
This court concur in opinion with the presiding judgei It may further be observed, that the statute of George the second, which requires two securities to a replev-in bond, is not of force in this state,
See City Council vs. Price, 1 M’Cord’s Rep. 299, where an intimation was made, that the 2 Geo. 2. c. 19, was of force'In practice, which by this case is decided not to he.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 S.C.L. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debow-v-mclary-scctapp-1825.