Deborah Martin v. Jo Anne Barnhart

217 F. App'x 581
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2007·No. 06-1267·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Social Security Administration denied Deborah Martin’s application for supplemental security income on August 1, 2001, and informed her that she had sixty days to request a hearing. When Martin did not file a request-for-hearing form until October 11, 2001, an administrative law judge dismissed the hearing request as untimely. Martin sought judicial review, and the district court 2 dismissed her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After de novo review, see United States v. Dico, Inc., 136 F.3d 572, 575 (8th Cir.1998), we agree with the district court that jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) was lacking and that dismissal was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deborah Martin v. Jo Anne Barnhart, 217 F. App'x 581 (8th Cir. 2007).

217 F. App'x 581 (Deborah Martin v. Jo Anne Barnhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dico, Incorporated
136 F.3d 572 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)