Deborah Martin v. Jo Anne Barnhart
This text of 217 F. App'x 581 (Deborah Martin v. Jo Anne Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Social Security Administration denied Deborah Martin’s application for supplemental security income on August 1, 2001, and informed her that she had sixty days to request a hearing. When Martin did not file a request-for-hearing form until October 11, 2001, an administrative law judge dismissed the hearing request as untimely. Martin sought judicial review, and the district court 2 dismissed her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After de novo review, see United States v. Dico, Inc., 136 F.3d 572, 575 (8th Cir.1998), we agree with the district court that jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) was lacking and that dismissal was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 F. App'x 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deborah-martin-v-jo-anne-barnhart-ca8-2007.