Deborah Francis v. Jeffrey Shorba

533 F. App'x 697
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 9, 2013·No. 13-1397·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Deborah Francis appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the grand jury selection process in Minnesota’s Fourth Judicial District violates the Fourteenth Amendment. Upon careful de novo review, see Schoelch v. Mitchell, 625 F.3d 1041, 1045-46 (8th Cir.2010) (standard of review), we agree with the district court’s reasons for concluding that Francis failed to establish a prima facie case for a Fourteenth Amendment violation. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boy-lan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deborah Francis v. Jeffrey Shorba, 533 F. App'x 697 (8th Cir. 2013).

533 F. App'x 697 (Deborah Francis v. Jeffrey Shorba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Francis v. Shorba
134 S. Ct. 2670 (Supreme Court, 2014)