Deborah Bell v. Danny L. Haney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Deborah Bell v. Danny L. Haney

DecidedJanuary 16, 2014

Docket02-13-00239-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Deborah Bell v. Danny L. Haney (Deborah Bell v. Danny L. Haney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deborah Bell v. Danny L. Haney, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00239-CV

DEBORAH BELL APPELLANT

V.

DANNY L. HANEY, LAW FIRM OF APPELLEES COBB MARTINEZ WOODWARD, AND ATTORNEY DAVID DENTON

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion To Dismiss.” In the

motion, it states that appellant has settled her claims with Cobb Martinez

Woodward, PLLC and David Denton. It is the court’s opinion that the motion to

dismiss the appeal as to appellees Cobb Martinez Woodward, PLLC and David

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Denton should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal as to Cobb Martinez

Woodward, PLLC and David Denton. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

The appeal shall hereafter be styled Deborah Bell v. Danny L. Haney.

Appellant’s brief is due Tuesday, February 18, 2014.

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 16, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI