Deborah Ann Wilson v. Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. T/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of the National Capital Area

995 F.2d 306, 301 U.S. App. D.C. 406, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22551, 1993 WL 207375
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 1993
Docket92-7092
StatusUnpublished

This text of 995 F.2d 306 (Deborah Ann Wilson v. Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. T/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of the National Capital Area) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deborah Ann Wilson v. Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. T/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of the National Capital Area, 995 F.2d 306, 301 U.S. App. D.C. 406, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22551, 1993 WL 207375 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Opinion

995 F.2d 306

301 U.S.App.D.C. 406

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Deborah Ann WILSON
v.
GROUP HOSPITALIZATION AND MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. t/a Blue
Cross and Blue Shield of the National Capital
Area, Appellant.

No. 92-7092.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 20, 1993.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; WALD and RUTH B. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the memorandum of appellant suggesting the appeal may be moot and in the alternative its motion to dismiss the appeal, vacate the preliminary injunction and remand the case to the district court for final determination on the merits, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that this appeal be dismissed as moot. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for an order directing the district court to vacate its preliminary injunction issued May 4, 1992, be denied. Vacatur is not appropriate under these circumstances. See United States v. Garde, 848 F.2d 1307, 1310 (D.C.Cir.1988) (when review "is prevented by the deliberate action of the losing party before the district court, the district court should not be ordered to vacate its decision").

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Billie Pirner Garde
848 F.2d 1307 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
995 F.2d 306, 301 U.S. App. D.C. 406, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22551, 1993 WL 207375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deborah-ann-wilson-v-group-hospitalization-and-medical-services-inc-ta-cadc-1993.