DeBlasio v. DeBlasio
158 A.D.2d 656, 551 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2347
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DeBlasio v. DeBlasio. Read the opinion of the Court — 187 A.D.2d 551 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1990·Published
Opinion
Upon review of the documentation submitted by the receiver, we find no reason to disturb either the amount of the fee or the apportionment thereof. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeBlasio v. DeBlasio, 158 A.D.2d 656, 551 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
158 A.D.2d 656 (DeBlasio v. DeBlasio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.