DeBlasi v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DeBlasi v. City of New York

306 A.D.2d 308, 760 N.Y.S.2d 667, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6463

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 308 (DeBlasi v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeBlasi v. City of New York, 306 A.D.2d 308, 760 N.Y.S.2d 667, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants New'York City Transit Authority and “John Doe” appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Gigante, J.), dated July 26, 2002, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellants do not challenge the fact that a bus owned by the New York City Transit Authority was involved in the instant accident. The plaintiff, in support of his motion for summary judgment, submitted evidence in admissible form which established as a matter of law that the accident occurred when the bus operator negligently changed lanes, striking the plaintiff’s vehicle (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128 [a]; Calandra v Dishotsky, 244 AD2d 376 [1997]). The appellants, in opposition, failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants New'York City Transit Authority and “John Doe” appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Gigante, J.), dated July 26, 2002, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellants do not challenge the fact that a bus owned by the New York City Transit Authority was involved in the instant accident. The plaintiff, in support of his motion for summary judgment, submitted evidence in admissible form which established as a matter of law that the accident occurred when the bus operator negligently changed lanes, striking the plaintiff’s vehicle (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128 [a]; Calandra v Dishotsky, 244 AD2d 376 [1997]). The appellants, in opposition, failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 308, 760 N.Y.S.2d 667, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deblasi-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack