DeBlase v. Winter Garden Co-operative Apartments, Inc.
This text of 142 So. 2d 307 (DeBlase v. Winter Garden Co-operative Apartments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants brought an action under chapter 517 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.1, declaring election to avoid a stock purchase and seeking to recover money paid for unregistered stock which by an amendment to the complaint was allegedly required to be registered with the Florida Securities Commission. The complaint was dismissed on defendants’ motion, on the ground that a ruling by the commission that the stock was required to be registered was a pre[308]*308requisite to suit2. The condition imposed by the trial court is not found in the language of the statute, nor may it be implied. The statute authorizes suit in court, and the court necessarily may make such rulings on the merits of the matter as are essential to determination of the cause, including whether there has been a violation of chapter 517, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., as alleged. Ap-pellees cite no authorities in support of the dismissal order, but argue it was proper under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction. There was no showing here of applicability or need to resort to that doctrine. See United States v. Western P. R. Co., 352 U.S. 59, 77 S.Ct. 161, 1 L.Ed.2d 126, 132. Cf. Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. Weiss, Fla.App.1959, 113 So.2d 884. The complaint as amended was sufficient, and the order of dismissal is reversed.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 So. 2d 307, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deblase-v-winter-garden-co-operative-apartments-inc-fladistctapp-1962.