Debinski v. Director of Patuxent Institution

221 A.2d 909, 243 Md. 695, 1966 Md. LEXIS 580
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 26, 1966·No. App. No. 51·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On 19, April, 1965, the applicant, serving a ten year sentence for perverted practice, was found by a jury to be a defective delinquent and committed to Patuxent.

In this application he attacks the constitutionality of Code (1957), Art. 31B (1965 Cum. Supp.). His contentions in this regard are thoroughly disposed of by our decision in Director v. Daniels, 243 Md. 16.

Applicant also contends that there was insufficient evidence to support a verdict of defective delinquency. The testimony of Dr. Boslow, the formal report from Patuxent, and the record of convictions are more than sufficient to support the verdict. Brunson v. Director, 239 Md. 128, 210 A. 2d 372 (1965).

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Debinski v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 221 A.2d 909, 243 Md. 695, 1966 Md. LEXIS 580 (Md. 1966).

221 A.2d 909 (Debinski v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wise v. Director, Patuxent Institution
230 A.2d 692 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1967)