Debinski v. Director of Patuxent Institution
This text of 221 A.2d 909 (Debinski v. Director of Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On 19, April, 1965, the applicant, serving a ten year sentence for perverted practice, was found by a jury to be a defective delinquent and committed to Patuxent.
In this application he attacks the constitutionality of Code (1957), Art. 31B (1965 Cum. Supp.). His contentions in this regard are thoroughly disposed of by our decision in Director v. Daniels, 243 Md. 16.
Applicant also contends that there was insufficient evidence to support a verdict of defective delinquency. The testimony of Dr. Boslow, the formal report from Patuxent, and the record of convictions are more than sufficient to support the verdict. Brunson v. Director, 239 Md. 128, 210 A. 2d 372 (1965).
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.2d 909, 243 Md. 695, 1966 Md. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debinski-v-director-of-patuxent-institution-md-1966.