DeBeradinis v. Allen Bros.

Connecticut Superior Court

DeBeradinis v. Allen Bros.

10 Conn. Supp. 548, 1942 Conn. Super. LEXIS 80

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedApril 11, 1942

DocketFile No. 63365

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Conn. Supp. 548 (DeBeradinis v. Allen Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeBeradinis v. Allen Bros., 10 Conn. Supp. 548, 1942 Conn. Super. LEXIS 80 (Colo. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

CORNELL, J.

The jury returned a verdict for the defendants in the above entitled case which was accepted on March 15, 1942, at 12:33 p.m. The plaintiff moved to set this aside by motion which was filed with the Clerk of the Supérior Court on March 19, 1942, at 4:33 p.m, which,, of course, was later than the period of 24 hours within which it is required that such a motion be filed. (Practice Book, [1934] §229.)

[549]*549No application was made to the court to extend the time for filing the motion to set the verdict aside and under the ruling in Aubrey vs. City of Meriden, 121 Conn. 361, 364, 365, there seems no reason why the motion to strike from the files should not be granted.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORNELL, J.

The jury returned a verdict for the defendants in the above entitled case which was accepted on March 15, 1942, at 12:33 p.m. The plaintiff moved to set this aside by motion which was filed with the Clerk of the Supérior Court on March 19, 1942, at 4:33 p.m, which,, of course, was later than the period of 24 hours within which it is required that such a motion be filed. (Practice Book, [1934] §229.)

[549]*549No application was made to the court to extend the time for filing the motion to set the verdict aside and under the ruling in Aubrey vs. City of Meriden, 121 Conn. 361, 364, 365, there seems no reason why the motion to strike from the files should not be granted.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Conn. Supp. 548, 1942 Conn. Super. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deberadinis-v-allen-bros-connsuperct-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack