DeBenedictis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DeBenedictis v. State

370 So. 2d 37, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14358

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 4, 1979

DocketNo. 78-795

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 370 So. 2d 37 (DeBenedictis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeBenedictis v. State, 370 So. 2d 37, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14358 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of Broward County. Appellants were tried and found guilty of four counts of grand larceny by fraudulent misrepresentation and four counts of criminal attempt. Appellants allegedly ran a fraudulent telephone solicitation operation whereby donations were sought for various “police” organizations and publications.

Appellants have raised eight points for consideration on appeal. We have considered each of these points on the basis of the briefs and record filed herein and find that appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error. The judgments and sentences below are, therefore, affirmed.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and SIEGENDORF, ARDEN M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of Broward County. Appellants were tried and found guilty of four counts of grand larceny by fraudulent misrepresentation and four counts of criminal attempt. Appellants allegedly ran a fraudulent telephone solicitation operation whereby donations were sought for various “police” organizations and publications.

Appellants have raised eight points for consideration on appeal. We have considered each of these points on the basis of the briefs and record filed herein and find that appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error. The judgments and sentences below are, therefore, affirmed.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and SIEGENDORF, ARDEN M., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

370 So. 2d 37, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debenedictis-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack