DeBellis v. Maula

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DeBellis v. Maula

190 A.D.2d 569

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 569 (DeBellis v. Maula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeBellis v. Maula, 190 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about September 25, 1991, which, inter alia, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff $150,000 for future pecuniary loss, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to increase the award for future pecuniary loss to $1 million, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

We find the verdict inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about September 25, 1991, which, inter alia, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff $150,000 for future pecuniary loss, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to increase the award for future pecuniary loss to $1 million, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

We find the verdict inadequate to the extent indicated. Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debellis-v-maula-nyappdiv-1993.