Debby Rose v. Cox Health Systems

377 F. App'x 573
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 26, 2010
Docket09-3614
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 377 F. App'x 573 (Debby Rose v. Cox Health Systems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Debby Rose v. Cox Health Systems, 377 F. App'x 573 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Debby Rose appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her disability-discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, and viewing it in the light most favorable to Rose, see Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 486 F.3d 480, 482 (8th Cir.2007) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper. For the reasons stated by the district court, we agree that there was insufficient evidence to show that Rose was a qualified individual with a disability or a person “regarded as” disabled. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Rose’s pending motion to supplement the record with documents that were not before the district court, see United States v. Drefke, 707 F.2d 978, 983 (8th Cir.1983) (appellate court must review case on record before district court), and deny her pending motion to stay.

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mia Bennett v. Hurley Medical Center
86 F.4th 314 (Sixth Circuit, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 F. App'x 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debby-rose-v-cox-health-systems-ca8-2010.