Debbie Williams and Linda Stanley, Cross-Appellants v. William R. Butler v. City of Little Rock, Arkansas, Third Party Appellant/cross-Appellee

762 F.2d 73, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31137
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 1985
Docket83-2534
StatusPublished

This text of 762 F.2d 73 (Debbie Williams and Linda Stanley, Cross-Appellants v. William R. Butler v. City of Little Rock, Arkansas, Third Party Appellant/cross-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Debbie Williams and Linda Stanley, Cross-Appellants v. William R. Butler v. City of Little Rock, Arkansas, Third Party Appellant/cross-Appellee, 762 F.2d 73, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31137 (3d Cir. 1985).

Opinion

762 F.2d 73

Debbie WILLIAMS and Linda Stanley, Plaintiffs/Appellees
Cross-Appellants,
v.
William R. BUTLER, Defendant,
v.
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, Third Party Defendant
Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 83-2534, 83-2641.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 1985.
Decided May 13, 1985.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, William R. Overton, U.S.D.C. Judge.

Thomas Carpenter, Little Rock, Ark., for third party defendant appellant, cross-appellee.

Philip Kaplan, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiffs, appellees, cross-appellants.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and HEANEY, BRIGHT, ROSS, McMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, en banc.

ORDER

The district court's decision is affirmed by an equally divided court. Chief Judge Lay, and Judges Floyd R. Gibson, Heaney, Bright, and Arnold vote to affirm the district court's decision. Judges Ross, McMillian, John R. Gibson, Fagg, and Bowman vote to reverse the district court's decision.

Appellee Williams' request for attorney fees is granted, with the following modification. Because appellee did not prevail on the punitive damages issue, the cost for services rendered will be reduced ten-percent to $8,055.00. The appellee's request for expenses in the amount of $1,068.79 is granted. Thus, the total award for fees and expenses allowed by the court is $9,123.79.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 F.2d 73, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debbie-williams-and-linda-stanley-cross-appellants-v-william-r-butler-v-ca3-1985.