Debartolo Corp. v. Cartwright

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Debartolo Corp. v. Cartwright

910 S.W.2d 675, 322 Ark. 561, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 749

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedNovember 20, 1995

Docket94-1147

StatusPublished

This text of 910 S.W.2d 675 (Debartolo Corp. v. Cartwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Debartolo Corp. v. Cartwright, 910 S.W.2d 675, 322 Ark. 561, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 749 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In response to appellee’s motion for disqualification, Justices Robert H. Dudley, Tom Glaze, and Donald Corbin recuse but not for any of the reasons set out in her motion. Appellee’s attorney, J. L. Wilson, was sanctioned in federal court as a result of a criminal conviction and is now the subject of disciplinary proceedings before the State Professional Conduct Committee and disbarment proceedings before the Phillips County Circuit Court which have been remanded to federal court. Because these named justices intend to seek Rule 11 sanctions to be imposed against attorney J. L. Wilson and his attorneys for filing a no-merit petition in federal court, we recuse.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In response to appellee’s motion for disqualification, Justices Robert H. Dudley, Tom Glaze, and Donald Corbin recuse but not for any of the reasons set out in her motion. Appellee’s attorney, J. L. Wilson, was sanctioned in federal court as a result of a criminal conviction and is now the subject of disciplinary proceedings before the State Professional Conduct Committee and disbarment proceedings before the Phillips County Circuit Court which have been remanded to federal court. Because these named justices intend to seek Rule 11 sanctions to be imposed against attorney J. L. Wilson and his attorneys for filing a no-merit petition in federal court, we recuse.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

910 S.W.2d 675, 322 Ark. 561, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/debartolo-corp-v-cartwright-ark-1995.