Deaton v. State

95 So. 3d 413, 2012 WL 3192756, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 2012·No. No. 4D11-2223·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant is cautioned against future filings which include challenges on those sentencing issues raised and rejected in his rule 3.800(a) motion, the denial of which we now affirm. Such filings may result in a show cause order and consideration of sanctions. See generally State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

MAY, C.J., GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deaton v. State, 95 So. 3d 413, 2012 WL 3192756, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

95 So. 3d 413 (Deaton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)