Deaton v. State

95 So. 3d 413, 2012 WL 3192756, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 8, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-2223
StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 3d 413 (Deaton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deaton v. State, 95 So. 3d 413, 2012 WL 3192756, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant is cautioned against future filings which include challenges on those sentencing issues raised and rejected in his rule 3.800(a) motion, the denial of which we now affirm. Such filings may result in a show cause order and consideration of sanctions. See generally State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

MAY, C.J., GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 3d 413, 2012 WL 3192756, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deaton-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.