Deason v. House of Denmark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Deason v. House of Denmark

884 S.W.2d 276, 1994 WL 313619

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 1994·No. No. 64810·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee, Daniel Deason, appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for workers’ compensation.

The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). The motion to strike employee’s brief is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee, Daniel Deason, appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for workers’ compensation.

The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). The motion to strike employee’s brief is denied.

Deason v. House of Denmark, 884 S.W.2d 276, 1994 WL 313619 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

884 S.W.2d 276 (Deason v. House of Denmark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.