Deary v. Anschustigui

Idaho Supreme Court

Deary v. Anschustigui

215 P. 462, 37 Idaho 135, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 112

DecidedApril 28, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 215 P. 462 (Deary v. Anschustigui) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deary v. Anschustigui, 215 P. 462, 37 Idaho 135, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 112 (Idaho 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

GIYENS, Commissioner.

— This is a companion case to Lessman v. Anschustigui, ante, p. 127, 215 Pac. 460, the loss in weight of the cattle herein being comparable to the failure of the cattle to increase therein. Appellant herein raises the additional point that the respondent did not show such ownership in the land as would entitle him to bring an action under the two-mile limit statute. He introduced in evidence title deeds to the land, and offered evidence that he was in possession of the land and claimed title and ownership thereof. This was sufficient. (Sifers v. Johnson, 7 Ida. 798, 97 Am. St. 271, 65 Pac. 709, 54 L. R. A. 785; Denney v. Arritola, 31 Ida. 428, 174 Pac. 135.)

[136]*136All the other points having been decided in the Lessman v. Anschustigui case, supra, the judgment in this case should be affirmed in the amount of $275, the value of the pasturage rented by respondent as a substitute for the pasturage destroyed by appellant’s sheep.

Budge, C. J., and McCarthy, Dunn and William A. Lee, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM.

— The above and foregoing has been examined and is hereby adopted in whole as the opinion of the court. If respondent, within 30 days of the receipt of the remittitur by the clerk of the court below, accepts a reduction of the judgment to $275, the judgment will be sustained. If not, the judgment will be reversed with instructions to grant a new trial, and it is so 'ordered. Costs to appellant.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIYENS, Commissioner.

— This is a companion case to Lessman v. Anschustigui, ante, p. 127, 215 Pac. 460, the loss in weight of the cattle herein being comparable to the failure of the cattle to increase therein. Appellant herein raises the additional point that the respondent did not show such ownership in the land as would entitle him to bring an action under the two-mile limit statute. He introduced in evidence title deeds to the land, and offered evidence that he was in possession of the land and claimed title and ownership thereof. This was sufficient. (Sifers v. Johnson, 7 Ida. 798, 97 Am. St. 271, 65 Pac. 709, 54 L. R. A. 785; Denney v. Arritola, 31 Ida. 428, 174 Pac. 135.)

[136]*136All the other points having been decided in the Lessman v. Anschustigui case, supra, the judgment in this case should be affirmed in the amount of $275, the value of the pasturage rented by respondent as a substitute for the pasturage destroyed by appellant’s sheep.

Budge, C. J., and McCarthy, Dunn and William A. Lee, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM.

— The above and foregoing has been examined and is hereby adopted in whole as the opinion of the court. If respondent, within 30 days of the receipt of the remittitur by the clerk of the court below, accepts a reduction of the judgment to $275, the judgment will be sustained. If not, the judgment will be reversed with instructions to grant a new trial, and it is so 'ordered. Costs to appellant.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 P. 462, 37 Idaho 135, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deary-v-anschustigui-idaho-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack