Dearman v. Bruns
183 S.E.2d 241, 279 N.C. 394, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 816
This text of 183 S.E.2d 241 (Dearman v. Bruns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dearman v. Bruns, 183 S.E.2d 241, 279 N.C. 394, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 816 (N.C. 1971).
Opinion
C. H. DEARMAN, Executor of the Estate of Richard Shaw Brown
v.
Lula Rumple BRUNS, Widow, Individually and as Executrix of Minnie Rumple Brown et al.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
William P. Pope, for plaintiff appellant.
Collier, Harris & Homesley, Richard M. Pearman, Jr., for defendants William M. Pressley, Willdred M. Pope, David W. Sides.
Sowers, Avery & Crosswhite, for appellees.
Petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 181 S.E.2d 809. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dearman v. Bruns
181 S.E.2d 809 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
183 S.E.2d 241, 279 N.C. 394, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dearman-v-bruns-nc-1971.