Dearing v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dearing v. State

348 So. 2d 1233

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 9, 1977

DocketNo. 76-1380

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 348 So. 2d 1233 (Dearing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dearing v. State, 348 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Charles Dearing, Jr. appeals a criminal conviction entered upon a jury verdict for unlawful possession of explosives without a permit [Sections 552.101, 552.22. Florida Statutes (1975)] in the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida. He contends on appeal that the trial court erred in certain of its instructions to the jury in the denial of defense motions to suppress and dismiss, and in a ruling on the waiver of defendant’s right to counsel and to remain silent. We affirm based on the following authorities: Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925) adopted by Section 933.-19, Florida Statutes (1975); State ex rel. Butler v. Cullen, 253 So.2d 861 (Fla.1971); Ponder v. State, 323 So.2d 296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); State v. Stanzione, 315 So.2d 500 (Fla 4th DCA 1975); King v. State, 303 So.2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Charles Dearing, Jr. appeals a criminal conviction entered upon a jury verdict for unlawful possession of explosives without a permit [Sections 552.101, 552.22. Florida Statutes (1975)] in the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida. He contends on appeal that the trial court erred in certain of its instructions to the jury in the denial of defense motions to suppress and dismiss, and in a ruling on the waiver of defendant’s right to counsel and to remain silent. We affirm based on the following authorities: Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925) adopted by Section 933.-19, Florida Statutes (1975); State ex rel. Butler v. Cullen, 253 So.2d 861 (Fla.1971); Ponder v. State, 323 So.2d 296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); State v. Stanzione, 315 So.2d 500 (Fla 4th DCA 1975); King v. State, 303 So.2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 So. 2d 1233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dearing-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack