Dearing v. Bailey Electric Co.

88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 124, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 158
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 19, 1916
Docket6698
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 S.E. 907 (Dearing v. Bailey Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dearing v. Bailey Electric Co., 88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 124, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Wade, J.

This case is controlled by the decision in Cheshire v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 16 Ga. App. 790 (86 S. E. 405), where it was held that “The authority of the appellate division of the municipal court of Atlanta on a motion for-a new trial is limited to ‘sustaining or overruling said motion.’ Acts 1913, p. 169, sec. 42 (f). The appellate division is without authority to render a final judgment in a cause when, upon the hearing of a motion for new trial, the verdict and the judgment of the trial judge entered thereon are set aside.”

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adair v. Allen
89 S.E. 1099 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 124, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dearing-v-bailey-electric-co-gactapp-1916.