Dearing v. Bailey Electric Co.

88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 124, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 158
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 19, 1916·No. 6698·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

This case is controlled by the decision in Cheshire v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 16 Ga. App. 790 (86 S. E. 405), where it was held that “The authority of the appellate division of the municipal court of Atlanta on a motion for-a new trial is limited to ‘sustaining or overruling said motion.’ Acts 1913, p. 169, sec. 42 (f). The appellate division is without authority to render a final judgment in a cause when, upon the hearing of a motion for new trial, the verdict and the judgment of the trial judge entered thereon are set aside.”

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dearing v. Bailey Electric Co., 88 S.E. 907, 18 Ga. App. 124, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

88 S.E. 907 (Dearing v. Bailey Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adair v. Allen
89 S.E. 1099 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)